Anugrah, I. R.; Mudzakir, A.; Sumarna, O. (2017): Construction of Context-Based Module: How OLED can be used as a Context in High School Chemistry Instruction, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 1-7.
- Akinoglu, O. & Tandogan, R. O. (2007): The Effects of Problem-based Active Learning in Science Education on Students’ Academic Achievement, Attitude and Concept Learning, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 71-81.
- Beghetto, R. (2008): Prospective Teacher Beliefs about Imaginative Thinking in K-12 Schooling Skills and Creativity. American Educational Research Journal, 3, 134-142.
- Boytche, P. ; Cheharova, T. & Sendova, E. (2007): Enhancing Spatial Imagination of Young Students by Activities in 3D Elica Application, Proceed 36th Spring Conference of the Union of Bulgarian Mathematicians.
- CORD (2017): REACTing to Learn:Student Engagement Strategies in Contextual Teaching and Learning, CORD Leading Change in Education, from:
http//:www.cord.org/REACTfly_website.pdf.
- Dehaan, R. (2009): Teaching Creativity and Invention Problem Solving in Science, Life Science Education, 8(4), 172-181.
- Dejong, O. (2008): Context- based Chemical Education: How to Improve it?, Chemical Education International, 8 (1), 1-7.
- Demir, H. & Demiricioglu, G. (2012): The Effect on a Teaching Material Developed based on “ REACT” Strategy of Gifted Sudents, Ondokuz Mayis University, 31 (2), 101-144.
- Dehaan, R. (2009): Teaching Creativity and Inventive Problem- Solving in Science, CBE-life Science Education, Vol.8, 172-181
- Douville, P.; Pugalee, D.; Wallace, J. & Lock, C. (2003): Investigating the Effectiveness of Mental Imagery Strategies in a Constructivist Approach to Mathematics Instruction, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Academic Press, Inc, 107- 111.
- Egan, K. (2007): An Imaginative Approach to Teaching, The Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3 (3), 247-248.
- Elvan, G. ; Ezgi, G. (2010): Effect of Problem Solving Method on Science Process Skills and Academic Achievement, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(4), 4, 19-32.
- Elaine B. Johnson. (2002): Contextual Teaching and Learning: What is it and why is it here to stay. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc. A Sage Publication Company.
- Gonzales, Mario A. ( 2019): What is imaginative thinking? Prisma Access- Secure Branches& Mobile Users.
- Hadzigeorgiou, Yannis & Fotinos, Nick (2007): Imaginative Thinking and the Learning of Science, The Science Education Review, 6(1), 15-23.
- Hadzigeorgiou, Yannis (2016): Imaginative Science Education, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
- Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2003): Models of Teaching, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, London.
- Jones, Dick (2017): Learning in Context, Technical Assistance Center of NY, TAC, A Divison of the Successful Practices Network, Questar BOCES.
- Koray, O.; Presley, A.; Koksal, M.& Ozdemir, M. (2008): Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills of Pre-serviece Elementary School Teachers Through Problem-based Learning, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 35-
- Laguardia, C. (2019): Imaginative thinking skills, Laguardia Community College, Article on “TRUISMS”, Intelligence and Creativity.
- Lochhead, J. (2014): Teaching Analytic Reasoning Skills Through Pair Problem Solving, in Judith W. Segal; Susan F. Chipman& Robert Glaser: Thinking and Learning Skills, Rlating Instruction to Research, Vol.(1), New York, London.
- Mayer, W. H. & Richard, E. (2002): Thinking Problem Solving Cognition, 2nd Edition Freeman and Company, New York.
- McLeish, Tom (2019): Science is Deeply Imaginative: Why is this Treated as a secret, Published in Association with Oxford University Press.
- Navin, P. Kanodia (2016): Importance of Imaginative Thinking, at:
http://www.navinkanodia.com/importance-of-imaginative-thinking/
- Nixon et al (2003): Open- Ended Problem Solving with Robotics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Ozaby, A. S. & Kayaoglu, M. N. (2015): The use of REACT Strategy for the Incorporation of the Context of Physics inti the Teaching English to the Physics Prep Students, Paper Presented in the 2nd English Students Conference, 8-10 May, in Karabuk University, 91- 117.
- Pollard, Andrew. (2002): Reflective Teaching Effective and Evidence, Informed Professional Practice, Continuum, London, New York.
- Sherman, Greg. (2002): What are Learning Contexts?, Computer- Supported Instructional Context.
- Southerland, A.S., et al (2003): Pportaraying Science in the Classroom: The Manifestation of Scientists’ Belifes in Classroom Practice, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (7), 669- 691.
- Terence, W. Cavanaugh; Cathy Cavanaugh (2004): Teach Science with Science Fiction Films: A Guide for Teachers and Library Media Specialists, Published by Linworth Publishing, Inc 480 East Wilson Bridge Road, PP 1-77.
- Trimmer, W. and Hawes, P. (2015): Inquiry-based Learning for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Programs: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. United Kingdom: Emerald
- Ultay, N.& Calik, M. (2016): A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of Acids and Bases Subjects, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 57-86.
- Ultay, E. & Ultay, N. (2014): Context-based Physics Studies: A Thematic Review of the Literature. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29 (3), 197-219.
- Ummels, M. H. et al (2015): Promoting Conceptual Coherence within Context-based Biology Education, Science Education, 99 (55), 958-985.
- Vos, R. (2014): The use of Context in Science Education, Second Reviewer, Gjalt Prints, 1-16.
- Wolcott, S. (2003): Steps for Better Thinking: Improving your Critical Thinking Ability. ، Retrieved from: https://www.wolottlynch.Comfindex_Files/hanout-hkust-030617-pdf.
- Wynne, C. (2001): High School Students use of Meioses When Solving Genetics Problem, International Journal of Science Teaching, 23 (5), 501-515.