Using the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) to Develop Knowledge Depth in Science and Achieve Mental Fitness (Memletics) for Second Preparatory Grade Pupils

Shehata, Sherein

Using the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) to Develop Knowledge Depth in Science and Achieve Mental Fitness (Memletics) for Second Preparatory Grade Pupils

Author

sherein shehata

Department of curriculum and Methodology Faculty of Education - New Valley University

Abstract

The aim of the current research is to: Know how to use the Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) model in developing knowledge depth in science and achieving Mental Fitness Memletics among second grade middle school students. The semi-experimental approach with two groups was used to study the effect of the independent factor (using the Argument Driven Inquiry model in teaching) on the dependent factor (cognitive depth and Mental Fitness Memletics). The research sample was selected from the students of the second year of middle school, and it was divided into two groups (30) students, an experimental group, and (30) students, a control group. The research presented two research tools: the mental fitness scale and the cognitive depth test. The averages of the two experimental and control groups were compared.

Keywords

References

Abd-El-Khalick, et.al. (2004): Inquiry in Science Education: International Perspectives, Culture and Comparative Studies, Wiley Periodicals, Inc, pp.397-418.

Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. Achieve. Inc.

Afgani, T., Hasnunidah, N., & Surbakti, A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dan Gender Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMP

Amelia, R., Budiasih, E., & Yahmin. (2020). Promoting the scientific argumentation skills of students using ADI-S and ADI models in chemical kinetics teaching. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215, No. 1, p. 020001). AIP Publishing LLC.

Aungst. , Gerald (2014). Using Webb's Depth of Knowledge to Increase Rigor https://www.edutopia.org/blog/webbs-depth-knowledge- increase-rigor-gerald-aungst Now Pinor

Bacon, D. (2004). An examination of two learning style measures and association with business learning, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. (75), No. (2), 205-208.

Bekiroglu, O., et.al. (2012): Examination of the Relationship between Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10 (6), pp.1415-1443.

Bennet, D., & Bennet, A. (2008). The depth of knowledge: surface, shallow or deep?. Vine, The journal of information and knowledge management systems, 38(4), 405- 420

Berland, K., Hammer, D. (2012): Framing for Scientific Argumentation Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1,PP 68-94.

Berland, L., Victor R. (2012): In Pursuit of Consensus: Disagreement and Legitimization during Small-Group Argumentation, International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), pp1857-1882

Berland. L & McNeill. K. (2010). A Learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work supportive and designing instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765- 793.

Boyles, Nancy (2016). Pursuing the Depths of Knowledge. Educational Leadership, v74 n2 p-p46-50.

Bricker, L., Bell, P. (2008): Conceptualizations of Argumentation from Science Studies and the Learning Sciences and their Implications for the Practices of Science Education., Science Education, 92 (3), pp. 473-498.

Bybee, R. et.al. (2006): The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications, Colorado Springs: BSCS.

Calik, M. (2013): Effect of Technology-Embedded Scientific Inquiry on Senior Science Student Teachers Self-Efficacy, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9 (3). pp. 223-232.

Cavagnetto, A. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A Review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Review of Education Research, 80(3), 336-371.

Chen, C. & She, H. (2013). The effectiveness of scientific inquiry with without intergration of scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), pp.1-20

Clark, D. B., & Sengupta, P. (2015). Argumentation and modeling: Integrating the products and practices of science to improve science education. In L. Johnston et al. (eds), STEM Education: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 47-67). Hershey: Information Science Reference. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-7363-2.ch003

Deborah B., Dennis C., Karen Mc., John R. W. (2009). Depth of Knowledge in the English Language Arts Classroom, The Standards Company.

Dickinson,D.K.,Nesbitt,K.T.,Collins, M.F.,Hadley,E.B.,Newman,K., Rivera ,B.L.,Ilgez,H.,Nicolopoulou,A., Golinkoff,R.M.,&Hirsh- Pasek, K.(2019).Teaching for Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge :Learning from Explicit and Implicit Instruction and the Storybook Texts. Early Childhood Research Quarlerly, Vol(47).

Donovan, S., Bransford, J. (2005): How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom, Washington, DC., National Academy Press.

Driver, R., et.al. (2000): Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms, Science Education, 83 (3): pp.287-312

Duschl, R., Ellenbogen, K. (2009).: Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria: Investigating Learners' Reasons for Reasons, Educacion Quimica, pp., 111-118.

Ebenzer, J., et.al. (2010): The Effects of Common Knowledge Construction Model Sequence of Lessons on Science Achievement and Relational Conceptual Change, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, (1), pp 25- 46.

Elizabeth Marconi, Chelli Smith, and Doug Lombardi (2009). Depth of Knowledge: An Effective Tool for Educating Students, Shop TALK, The Southern Nevada Regional Professional Development Program, Vol. 4, No. 2

Erik M. Francis. (2016). What exactly is depth of knowledge. Retrieved http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/what-exactly-is-depth-of-fromknowledge-hint-its-not-a-wheel

Fathya, Z., Hasnunidah, N., & Sikumbang, D. (2020) Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument- Driven Inquiry (ADI) dan Gender Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi.

Felder, R. (2002). How students learn: Adapting teaching styles to learning styles, Proceeding, Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE, Santa Barbara, California.

Grooms, J. (2011): Using Argument-Driven Inquiry to Enhance Students' Argument Sophistication When Supporting a Stance in the Context of Socioscientific Issues, Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Paper 3950.

Grooms, J. (2020). A Comparison of Argument Quality and Students' Conceptions of Data and Evidence for Undergraduates Experiencing Two Types of Laboratory Instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(8), 2057-2064.

Gultepe, N. & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Scientific Process Skills in the Context of Teaching Chemistry. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(1), 111-132.

Gunckel, L. (2013): Fulfilling multiple obligations: Preservice elementary teachers' use of an instructional model while learning to plan and teach science, Science Education, 97 (1), pp. 139-162.

Hansal, D. (2006). New accelerated learning system-Memletics- helps learn faster and improve their memory, Skills Techniques Journal, Vol. (4), No. (7), 13-27.

Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2020) The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students' concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(1), 6.

Herman, Joan & Linn, Robert (2014). New Assessments, New Rigor, Educational Leadership, v71 n6 p-p34-37.

Hess, K. K., Jones, B. S., Carlock, D., & Walkup, J. R. (2009). Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom's Taxonomy and Webb's Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom-Level Processes. Online Submission.

Hess, Karin (2013). Guid for Using Webb Depth of Knowledge with Common Core State Students, Common Core Institute.

Holmes, S. (2011). Teacher preparedness for teaching and assessing depth of knowledge. proQuest Dissertations & theses Global. (229)

Holmes, S. (2011). Teacher preparedness for teaching and assessing depth of knowledge. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Retrieved Mar.17, 2019 http://search.proquest.com/ docview/ from: 868523326?accountid=142908.

Jackson, T. (2010). Teacher Depth of Knowledge as a Predicator of Student Achievement in the Middle Grades. PhD Dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.

Karin Hess (2013). Guid for Using Webb Depth of Knowledge with Common Core State Students, Common Core Institute.

Kelly, G. Bazerman, C. (2003): How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical semantic analysis, Applied Linguistics, 24 (1), 28-55.

Khishfe, R. & Alshaya, F. & BouJaoude, S. & Mansour Alrudiyan, K. (2017).Students understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299-334.

Khishfe, R. (2013). Relationship between nature of science understandings and skills: A Role for argumentation counterargument and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489-514.

Kuhn, D., Udell, W. (2003): The Development of Argument Skills, Child Development, 74 (5), pp. 1245-1260.

Kumdang, P., Kijkuakul, S., & Chaiyasith, W. C. (2020). DEVELOPMENT OF ARGUMENT- DRIVEN INQUIRY MODEL TO ENHANCING GRADE 10 STUDENT'S CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION NARESUAN UNIVERSITY, 22(2), 147-156.

Lawson, A. (2003): Hypothetico-predictive The Nature and Development of Argumentation with Iimplications for Science Teaching, International Journal of Science Education, 25 (11), pp. 1387-1408.

Lederman, N & J. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry:Building instructional capacity through professional development. Handbook of research on science ducation, 335-359.

Lee, S. (2011): Writing Activities Embedded in Bioscience Laboratory Courses to Change Students' Attitudes and Enhance their Scientific

Lehrer, R., schwable. L. (2009): Images of learning, Images of progress, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6), pp. 605- 737.

Liu, T, et.al. (2009): The Effects of Mobile Natural-science Learning Based on the 5E Learning Cycle: A Case Study, Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), pp. 344-358.

Lunetta V, Hofstein A. & Clough M. (2007): Learning and Teaching in the School Science Laboratory: an Analysis of Aesearch, Theory, and Practice, In Handbook of research on science education, eds Lederman N & Abel S. pp. 393-441. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mannucci, P V& Yong, K (2018): The Differential Impact Knowledge Depth and Knowledge Breadth on Creativity over Individual Careers. Academy of Management Journal, Vol (61), No (5). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0529

Matthew, C., & Onyejegbu, C. (2013). Effects of use of Instructional Materials on Students Cognitive Achievement in Agricultural Science. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3 (5). FABRICA

McIntyre, C. J., Lindt, S., & Miller, S. (2020, April). Using Flipgrid to increase college students' depth of knowledge. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1825-1830). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229.

McNeill, K., Knight, A, (2013): Teachers' Pedagogical Content The Impact of Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: professional Development on K-12 Teachers, Science Education, 97 (6), pp. 936-972.

National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, National Academy Press.

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education, Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, National Academy Press.

Nedved, S. (2015). The effects of argumentation strategies, integrated in guided-inquiry activities, on eight-grade physics students' understanding of concepts. (Master of Science), Montana State Unversity, Bozeman, Montana.

Norris, S & Philips, L & Osborne, J. (2007). Scientific inquiry: The place of interpretation and argumentation. In Science as inquiry in the secondary setting, eds. J. Luft, R. Bell, and J. Gess- Newsome. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Odgen, L, (2000): Collaborative tasks During peer interaction at key stage, British Education Research Journal, 26 (2), DD. 211-226.

Olvera, Gerlinde W.; Walkup, John R (2010). Questioning Strategies for Teaching Cognitively Rigorous Curricula, ED518988, https://eric.ed.gov/?q=%22Depth+of+knowledge%22&i d=ED518988

Osborne, J. et.al. (2013): Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students, Journal of Research in 50 (21) 215 217

Safitri, M. A. D., Budiasih, E., & Marfu'ah, S. (2020). Mind mapping in argument-driven inquiry (ADI) model to improve students' critical thinking skills with a different prior knowledge in the topic of reaction rate. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215, No. 1, p. 020022). AIP Publishing LLC.

Sampson et al. (2015). Argument Driven Inquiry in chemistry. National Science Association Teaching (NSTA), Arlington, Virginia Press

Sampson, V. & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & Practices in Biology.American Biology Teacher, 71(8), pp.465-472.

Sampson, V. & Grooms, J. (2008). Science as Argument-Driven Inquiry: The impact on students' conceptions of the nature of scientific inquiry. In the Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST).

Sampson, V. (2009): Argument-Driven Inquiry and the development of science proficiency in the laboratory. Paper presented at the 2009 Biannual International Meeting of the European Science Education Research Association, Istanbul, Turkey.

Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J. (2013). Argumentation in science and science education. The Science Teacher, 80 (5), 30-33.

Sampson, V., et.al. (2013). Writing to learn and learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J. and Walker, J. (2009). Argument driven inquiry to promote learning and interdisciplinary work in science classrooms. The Science Teacher, 76(8), 42-47.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257.

Sampson, V., Hester, M., Enderle, P., & Grooms, J. (2012) The Development of Science Proficiency Through Argument Focused Lab Instruction in High School Biology. In Annual Highlight

Sandoval, W. and Reiser, B. (2004). Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry, Science Education, 88 (3): 345-372.

Sirin, A. & Guzel, A. (2006). The Relationship between Learning Styles and Problem Solving Skills among College Students. Journal of Educational Sciences, 6 (1), 255-264.

Torres, T., et.al. (2013): Generating Students' Information Seeking Questions in the Scholar Lab: What Benefits Can We Expect From Inquiry Teaching Approaches?, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9 (3).

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated Edition). United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.

Venville, G & Dawson, V. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977.⁹529

Viator, C. (2010). A Critical Analysis of the Implementation of Depth of Knowledge and Preliminary Findings Regarding Its Effectiveness in Language Arts Achievement. PhD Dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.

Walker, J. (2011): Argumentation in undergraduate chemistry laboratories, electronic theses, florida state university.

Walker, J.P., Sompson, V., Grooms, J. Anderson, B., & Zimmerman C.O (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs: The Impact on Students' Conceptual Understanding, Argument Skills, and Attitudes toward Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 74-81

Wallace, C., Hand, B., Prain, V. (2004): Writing and Learning in the Science Classroom, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Webb, N. (2005). Report: Alignment Analysis of Science Standards and Assessments, Michigan, Grades 5 and 8. Retrieved Feb. 26, 2015 from: http://www.isbe.net/ as-sessment/pdfs/isat_align_science.pdf.

Webb, N. (2006). Report: Alignment Analysis of Science Learning Standards and Assess-ments, Grades 4, 7, and 11, Illinois, Alternate Assessments. Retrieved Feb. 26, 2015 from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.173.5268&rep=rep1& type-pdf. --- Webb, N. (2007). Aligning Assessments and Standards. Retrieved Mar. 19, 2019 from: http://www.weer.wisc. edu/news/coverStories/aligning_assessments and standards.php.

Webb, N. L. (2002). Technical Issues in Large-Scale Assessment, report published by CCSSO, December.

Webb, N. L. (2006). Webb Alignment Tool, Wisconsin Center of Educational Research, University of Wisconsin.

Webb, N. L. (2009). Webb's Depth of Knowledge Guide, Career and Technical Education Definitions, University of Wisconsin, Center for Education Research.

Webb, N. L. (1997). Determining Alignment of Expectations and Assessments Mathematics and Science in Education. Nise Brief, 1(2), n2

Webb, N.L. (2002). Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas. Retrieved Mar. 19, 2019 from: mhttp://facstaff.wcer.wisc.edu/normw/All%20content%20areas%20%20D OK %20levels % 2032802.pdf.

Weinberger, D. R., Elvevåg, B., & Giedd, J.N. (2005). The adolescent brain: A work in progress. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, Celebrating A Decade of Progress in Improving the Lives of Children, Youth and Families, Retrieved from www.teenpregnancy.org.

Whitely, S. (2006). Memletics accelerated learning styles manual, USA: Published by Advanogy Com

Whitely, S. (2009). Memletics learning styles inventory, USA: A free publication provided by www.memletics.com.

Wisdom, M. V. (2020). Measuring the Effect of Argument- Driven Inquiry on High School Chemistry Students' Process- Oriented Motivation Utilizing the Newly Developed Process- Oriented Motivation Instrument.

Yeh, T. (2012): Major Strands in Scientific Inquiry through Cluster Analysis of Research Abstracts, International Journal of Science Education. 34 (18), pp.2811-2842.