Ahmed, G. (2012). Modern concepts in the curriculum and the teaching of nanotechnology. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 8 (3), 55-63.
Aldea, A & Bârsan, V. (2010). Trends in nanophysics theory, experiment and technology. NY: Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London.
Ceran, S & Ates, S. (2020). Conceptual understanding levels of students with different cognitive styles: An evaluation in terms of different measurement techniques. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 88, 149-178.
Darweesh, H. (2017). Nanomaterials: Classification and Properties-Part I. Nanoscience, 1, 1-11
Dutta, J. & Hofmann, H. (2005). Nanomaterials,
Encyclopedia Nanosci. Nanotechnol, 9, 617.
Godwin, B. & Okoronka, U. (2015). Attitude and Academic Performance of Senior Secondary School Students in Physics in Nigeria. Paper presented at Proceeding of SOCIOINT15, 2nd International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hayes, A. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah: Lawrence Elbaum Association, Inc.
Hernánez-Suarez, C; Gamboa-Suárez, A & Suarez, O. (2021). Attitudes towards physics. A study with high school students from the Colombian context. 1st International Conference on Physical Problems of Engineering (1st ICPPE). Journal of Physics: 2118 (012019) IOP.
Ibrahim, N & Zakiang, M. (2019). Attitude in learning physics among form four students. Social and Management Research Journal. 16. 19. 10.24191/smrj.v16i2.7060.
Jones, M et al. (2007). Differences in African-American and European-American students-engagement with nanotechnology experience: Perceptual position or assessment artifact? Journal
of Researching Science Teaching,
44 (6), 787-799.
Khan, I; Saeed, K& Khan, I. (2019). Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 12 (7), 908-931.
Konicek-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. Arlington: NSTA Press, National Science Teachers Association.
Kwo, j. (2013).
Introduction to Nanophysics. Department of Physics: National Tsing Hua University. Retrieved 3 June, 2022 From:
https://indico.ictp.it/event/a10137/session/2/contribution/1/material/0/0.pdf
Mabee, M; Haruna, T & Salifu, A. (2021). Attitude of students towards the study of physics: A case of tamale college of education, Ghana.. Journal of Education and Learning Technology. 10-16.
Nikolić, B. (2022). What is Nanophysics: Survey of Course Topics. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, U.S.A. Retrieved 3 Aug, 2022 From: http://wiki.physics.udel.edu/phys824
Nimibofa, A; Ebelegi, A ; Abasi, C & Donbebe, W. (2018). Fullerenes: Synthesis and Applications. Journal of Materials Science Research. 7. 10.5539/jmsr.v7n3p22.
Poole, C. & Owens , F. (2003). Introduction to nanotechnology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
Sadiku, M; Ashaolu, T; Ajayi-Majebi, A & Musa, S. (2021). Future of nanotechnology. International Journal of Scientific Advances. 2. 10.51542/ijscia.v2i2.9.
Saricayir, H; et al. (2016). Determining students’ conceptual understanding level of thermodynamics. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4 (6), 69- 79.
Sattler, K. (2011). 21st century nanoscience – A handbook: Public policy, education, and global trends (volume ten). NY: CRC Press.
Selim, S. (2015). Integrating nanotechnology concepts and its applications into the secondary stage physics curriculum in Egypt. European Scientific Journal, 11 (12), 196-220.
Shandiz,M; Safaei, A; Sanjabi, S;& Barber, Z. (2007). Modeling size dependence of melting temperature of metallic nanoparticles. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 68 (7), 1396-1399.
Shrigley, R; & Koballa, I. (1984). Attitude measurement: Judging the emotional intensity of likert-type science attitude statements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 21 (2), 111-118.
Sreekanth, N. (2013). Nanofibers - A new trend in Nano drug delivery systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Analysis. 3. 47-55.
Svenningsson, J; Hulte, M; & Hallstro, J. (2016). Understanding attitude measurement: exploring meaning and use of the PATT short questionnaire. Int J Technol Des Educ. Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linko¨ping University.
Tan, K & Yeo, J. (2022). Advancing conceptual understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 1 (2), 55-63.
Tan, R., Yangco, R., & Que, E. (2020). Students’ conceptual understanding and science process skills in an inquiry-based flipped classroom environment. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 17 (1), 159-184
Tan, R., Yangco, R., & Que, E. (2020). Students’ conceptual understanding and science process skills in an inquiry-based flipped classroom environment. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 17 (1), 159-184.
Taran, M; Safaei, M; Karimi, N & Almasi, A. (2021). Benefits and application of nanotechnology in environmental science: an overview.
Bio interface Research in Applied Chemistry. 11. 7860 - 7870.
Veith, J; Bitzenbauer, P & Girnat, B. (2022). Assessing learners’ conceptual understanding of introductory group theory using the CI²GT: Development and analysis of a concept inventory. Education Sciences. 10.3390/educsci12060376.
Veloo, A., Nor, R., & Khalid, R. (2015). Attitudes towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement.
International Education Series, 8, 35-43.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005) Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD