A program based on the interstitial approach to develop the understanding of energy across scientific fields and beliefs towards the unity of knowledge of biological teachers at the secondary stage

Document Type : Researches for promotion to assistant professor and professor degrees

Author

Assistant Professor of Curricula and Methods of Teaching Science, Faculty of Education, Alexandria University

Main Subjects

References

  1. American Association For The Advancement Of Science . (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, D.C: Author.
  2. Angelique chettiparamb (2007), Interdisciplinary Aliterature Reriew. The Higher Education Academy November university of Southampton.
  3. Barrow, L. H., & Morrisey, J. T. (1989). Energy literacy of ninth-grade students: A comparison between Maine and New Brunswick. The Journal of Environmental Education, 20(2), 22-25.
  4. Biological Science Curriculum Study. (2001). BSCS Biology: A molecular approach(8th ed.). New York, NY: Glencoe McGraw-Hill.
  5. Biological Science Curriculum Study. (2009). Biology Teacher's Handbook (4Th ed.). Arlington, Virginia: NSTA Press.
  6. Buehi, M & Alexander.(2005). Motivation and Performance differences in Students Domain – specific Epistemological Belief Profiles. American Educational Research Journal. 42 (4). 697 – 726.
  7. Chabalengula, V&Others. (2012). Diagnosing Student’ understanding  of energy and its related concepts in biological context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 241-266.
  8. Cooper,  M .  M .,  & Klymkowsky, M. M. (2013). The Trouble with Chemical Energy: Why Understanding Bond Energies Requires an Interdisciplinary Systems Approach, CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12, 306-312.
  9. Daane, A. R. Scherr, R. E., &Vokos, S. (2013). Learner intuitions about energy degradation. Science Education, 89(1), 38–55.
  10. DeWaters, J. E., &  Powers, S. E. (2011). “Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior.” Energy Policy, 39(3), 1699–1710.
  11. Donovan, D. A.& Others. (2013). Advantages and Challenges of Using Physics Curricula as a Model for Reforming an Undergraduate Biology Course. Cell Biology Education, 12(2), 215–229.
  12. Drake, S. M., Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum.( 1st Ed). Association for Supervision& Curriculum Development.
  13. Dreyfus, B. W. (2014). Interdisciplinary Reasoning about Energy In An Introductory Physics Course  For The Life Sciences. (Phd), Maryland University.
  14. Dreyfus, B. W.&Others. (2014). Avision of interdisciplinary education: Students’ reasoning about “high-energy bonds” and ATP. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, in press.
    1. Dreyfus, B. W., Redish, E. F., & Watkins, J. (2012). Student views of macroscopic and microscopic energy in physics and biology. Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings
  15. Duit, R. (1981). Students' notions about the energy concept - before and after physics instruction. In W. Jung, Pfundt, H. ,Rhoeneck, C. von (Ed.), Proceedings of the international workshop on "problems concerning students' representation of physics and chemistry knowledge" (268-319). Ludwig burg: Paedagogische Hochschule.
  16. Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school - empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19(1), 59-66.
  17. Duit, R. (2012). Towards a learning progression of energy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Indianapolis, IN.
  18. Eisenkraft, A.& Others (2014). Introduction: Why Focus on Energy Instruction ?. In F. Chen,  D.  Fortus, K.  Neumann & A. SCheef(Eds.), Teaching and Learning of Energy in K-12 Education. New York: Springer.
  19. Hartley, L. M.&Others. (2012). Energy and  Matter: Differences in Discourse in Physical and Biological Sciences Can Be Confusing For Introductory biology Students. Bioscene, 62(5), 488-496
  20. Hashweh M. Z. (1986). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching & Teacher Education 3(2), 109-120.
  21. Hertting, Scott.(2016). Energy Blocks--A Physical Model for Teaching Energy Concepts. Physics Teacher, 54 (1).31-33 Jan .
  22. Hicks, N. (1983). Energy is the capacity to do work - or is it? The Physics Teacher,( 21), 529–530.
  23. Hilborn, R. (2014, March). The 2014 Conference on Introductory Physics for the Life Sciences. Paper Presented at The American Association of Physics Teachers Sumer Meeting.
  24. Hoffer, B. (1994). Epistemological Beliefs and First- Year college students: Motivation and Cognition in different instructional contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American psychological association. Los Aneles, August 12-16.
  25. Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2010). Developing a Long-term Learning Progression for Energy in Socio-Ecological Systems. The Paper Presented at The National Association  For The Science Teaching.
  26. Jin, H., & Wei, X. (2014). Using Ideas from the History of Science and Linguistics to Develop a Learning Progression for Energy in Socio-ecological Systems. In F. Chen,  D.  Fortus, K.  Neumann & A. SCheef(Eds.), Teaching and Learning of Energy in K-12 Education. New York: Springer.
  27. Kardash, C. Sintara, G. (2003). Epistmological Beliefs and Dipositions: are we measuring the same construct? . Poster Session Presented at The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association (84th(. Chicago, April 21-25.
  28. Kattmann, Ulrich.(2018). A Biologist's Musing on Teaching about Entropy and Energy: Towards a Better Understanding of Life Processes .School Science Review, 99 (368).61-68 Mar.
  29. Klein, J. C. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
  30. Labov, J. B.&Others. (2010). Integrated Biology and Undergraduate Science Education: A New Biology Education for the Twenty-First Century?, CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 10-16.
  31. Lancor, Rachael.(2014).Using Metaphor Theory to Examine Conceptions of Energy in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics.Science& Education, 23 (6).1245-1267 Jun.
  32. Lehrman, R. L. (1973). Energy is not the ability to do work. The Physics Teacher,  ( 11), 15–18.
  33. Lin, C. Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Students' understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis, and respiration. International Journal Science Education. 25(12), 1529-1544.
  34. Lodewyk, K. (2007). Relations Among Epistemological Belifs, Academic Achievement , and Task Performance in Secondary School Students. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 307-327.
  35. Lopez, R. E., & Schultz, T. (2001). Two Revolutions in K-8 Science Education. Physics Education, 54(9), 44-49.
  36. Minkoff, E. & Baker, A (2003) "Biology Today: An issue Approach: (3rd Edition), England: Taylor & Francis Group.
  37. Murphy, E., (2000)"Strangers in a Strang land. Teacher Beliefs about Teaching and Leaning French as a Second or Foreign Language in Online Learning Environment.
  38. Nagel, Megan L.; Lindsey, Beth A.(2015).Student Use of Energy Concepts from Physics in Chemistry Courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16 (1).67-81.
  39. National Research Council. (2009). New Biology for the 21st Century: Ensuring the UnitedStates Leads the Coming Biology Revolution . Washington, DC: National Academy Press
  40. National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  41. National Science Foundation. (2002). Quantitative Environmental and IntegrativeBiology.Retrievedfromhttps://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/nsf00149/nsf00149.htm.
  42. Opitz, S. T&Others (2017). How Do Students Understand Energy in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics? Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3019-3042.
  43. Park, M. (2012). Developing an instrument  for assessing students’ understanding of the energy concept across science discipline. (Phd), the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York.
  44. Park, Mihwa; Liu, Xiufeng.(2016).Assessing Understanding of the Energy Concept in Different Science Disciplines. Science Education, 100 (3).483-516 May.
  45. Paulsen, M & Feldman, K. (2005). The Conditional and Interaction Effects of Epistemological Beliefs on the Self – Regulated Learning of College Students: Motivational Strategies. Research in Higher Education.46 (7). 731- 768.
    1. Pehkonen, E., Toner, G. (1999).Introduction to the Abstract Book for Oberwolpah Meeting on Research into Belief "in: Mathematical Beliefs and Their Impact on Teaching and Learning of Mathematics , Conference .From 21 November Until 27 November , Gehard- Mercato University.
      1. Printó, R., Couso, D., & Gutierrez, R. (2005). Using research on teachers’ transformations of innovations to inform teacher education. The case of energy degradation. Science Education, 89(1), 38–55.

           Retrieved from:http://www.ucs.mum.ca/zemurphy/strangers/toc.html.

  1. Rueda, R., Garcia, E. (1994):Teachers' Beliefs About Reading- Assessment With Lotion Language Minority Students". National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, CA, USA.
  2. Sabella, M. & Lang, M. ( 2014). Research and education at the crossroads of biology and physics. American Journal Of Physics, 82(5), 365-366.
  3. Schaal, S., &Others. (2010). Concept mapping assessment of media assisted learning in interdisciplinary science education. Research in Science Education, 40, 339-352.
  4. Scherr, Rachel E.;& others .(2016). Energy Tracking Diagrams. Physics Teacher, 54 (2).96-102 Feb .
    1. Schommer, M & Dunnell , P (1997). Epistemological Beliefs of Gifted High School Students. Roper Review, 19 (3) , 153-156.
    2. Schommer, M. (1993A). Comparisons of Beliefs about the Nature of Knowledge and Learning among Postsecondary Students. Research in Higher Education, 34, (3), 355–370.
    3. Shulman, L.S.(1986). Those Who Understand :Knowledge Growth. In Teacher Educational Researcher. 15(2).4-14.
    4. Thomas Connelly & Phillip sharp (2009). A new Biolioy for the 21st Century, national academy of science.
  5. Tomazic, Iztok; Vidic, Tatjana .(2012). Future Science Teachers' Understandings of Diffusion and Osmosis Concepts. Journal of Biological Education, v46 n2 p66-71.
  6. Ulsh, L. S. (2011). Accelerated Integrated Science Sequence: Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Science For 21st Century.((Phd), Claremont University.
  7. Viglietta, L. (1990). Efficiency’ in the teaching of energy. Physics Education, (25), 317.
  8. Vinner, S. (1999). Beliefs we Live by and Quit often Revenant Ware of their possible impact on teaching and learning Mathematics. In :Mathematical Belifs and their impact on Teaching and learning of Mathematics Conference. Gehard- Mercato University, November 21-27.
  9. Wake, M. H. (2008). Integrative Biology: Science for 21st Century.BioScene, 58(4), 349-353.
  10. Wang, H. (2012). A New Era of Science Education: Science Teachers‘ Perceptions and Classroom Practices of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Integration. (Phd), Minnesota University

 

 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics