Basadur, M. I. N., Runco, M. A., & VEGAxy, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 77-100.
Brewer, J., & Daane, C. J. (2002). Translating constructivist theory into practice in primary-grade mathematics. Education, 123(2).
Chadwick, D. (2009). Approaches to Building Conceptual Understanding. Ministry of Education by Learning Media Limited, Wellington, New Zealand.
Clark, D. R. (2000). Effects of teaching high school chemistry with dynamic particle models on student achievement and conceptual understanding. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Catholic University of America.
Cramond, B. (2005). Fostering creativity in gifted students. USA: Prufrock Press Inc.
Glynn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: teaching with analogies. In S. Mikeskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband & M. Bruckman (Eds.). Four decades of research in Science Education: From curriculum development to quality improvement. Munster, Germany: Waxmann.
Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Hwang, F. K. (2008). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understandings about seasons: The design of a technology-enhanced learning environment. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 127-147.
Johnson,B. R.& et al. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. American Psychological Association. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2),346-362
Joseph, A. (2011). Grade 12 Learners Conceptual Understanding of Chemical, Representatio. (Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Johannesburg).
Jung ,1. (2002). Student representation and understanding of geometric transformations with technology experience. PhD. Dissertation. Georgia, Athens. Retrieved from: http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga etd/jung inchul 200205 p hd
Lehtelä, P. L. (2001). Role-playing, Conceptual Change, and the Learning Process: A Case Study of 7th Grade Pupils. In Research in Science Education-Past, Present, and Future (pp. 211-216). Springer, Dordrecht.
Leonor, J. P. (2015). Exploration of conceptual understanding and science process skills: A basis for differentiated science inquiry curriculum model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(4), 255-259.
Malaysia, E. U. K. (2011). Students' procedural and conceptual understanding of mathematics. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(7), 684-691.
Nippold, M. A., & Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(4), 788-799.
Oliver, E. (2007). Effective teaching strategies for promoting conceptual understanding in secondary science education (Doctoral dissertation, Evergreen State College).
Osman, K., & Sukor, N. S. (2013). Conceptual understanding in secondary school chemistry: A discussion of the difficulties experienced by students. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(5), 433-441.
Palmer, D. (2001). Students' alternative conceptions and scientifically acceptable conceptions about gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 691-706.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of educational psychology, 93(2), 346.
Saleh, S. (2011). The Level of B. Sc. Ed Students' Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 249.
Şimşek, P., & Kabapınar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students’ conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1190-1194.
Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Practice problems for creative problem solving. USA: Prufrock Press Inc.
Wiggins, G. P., Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria: Ascd.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179.
Yurick, K. A. (2011). Effects of problem-based learning with Web-anchored instruction in nanotechnology on the science conceptual understanding, the attitude towards science, and the perception of science in society of elementary students. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Florida Atlantic University).