The effectiveness of using the fish bone strategy in teaching biology to students Secondary second grade in developing depth of biological knowledge And visual thinking skills

Document Type : Researches for promotion to assistant professor and professor degrees

Author

Lecturer of Curricula and Methods of Teaching Science, Faculty of Education, Minia University

Abstract

The research aimed at identifying the effectiveness of using the bone fish strategy in teaching the unit entitled “Transportation in living beings” to second grade secondary school students in developing depth of biological knowledge and visual thinking skills. To achieve the aim of the research, the unit, which was part of the Biology subject the students studied in 2016/2017 was redesigned and taught using the bone fish strategy. The sample consisted of sixty-four students, who were divided into two groups: one control (32 students) who studied through the conventional method and the other experimental (32 students) who studied using the bone fish strategy. Two instruments: the test of depth of biological knowledge and the scale of visual thinking skills were used to collect data from the research groups before and after the treatment. Statistical analysis using means, standard deviations, t-test, and (d) indicator by Cohn were carried out. The findings of the research revealed the effectiveness of using the bone fish strategy in developing biological knowledge depth and visual thinking skills. Recommendations and suggestions were made in light of the findings revealed by the research.
   

Main Subjects


American Society for Quality. (n.d). Fishbone diagram. Retrieved from http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/cause-analysis-tools/overview/fishbone.html. Last visited. 24 February 2018.
Hess. K. K. (2010). Applying web’s depth of knowledge (DOK) levels in science. Retrieved from. http://www.rgccisd.org/training%202013%2014/Tri-Lin/DOK%20Levels%20Science.pdf. Last visited. 17 February 2018.
Jackson. T.H. (2010). Teacher Depth of Knowledge as a Predictor of Student Achievement in the Middle Grades. Ph.D. dissertation. university of Southern Mississippi. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2015&context=dissertations. Last visited. 17 February 2018.
Matthews, B. (2010). Developing Higher Order Thinking Questions Based on Webb’s DOK and FCAT Content Complexity. Retrieved from. https://fchsteaching2.wikispaces.com/file/view/1++Higher+Order+Thinking+Questions+preso.pdf. Last visited. 9th February 2018.
ohio department of Education (n.d). DOK question stem. Retrieved from.https://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Teaching/Educator-Evaluation-System/How-to-Design-and-Select-Quality-Assessments/DOK-Question-Stems.pdf.aspx. Last visited. 11 February 2018.
 Slameto (2016). The Application of Fishbone Diagram Analysis to Improve School Quality. Dinamika Ilmu, 16 (1). 59-74.
Viator, c. E. (2010). A Critical Analysis of the Implementation of Depth of Knowledge and Preliminary Findings Regarding Its Effectiveness in Language Arts Achievement. Ph.D. dissertation. university of Southern Mississippi. Retrieved from. http://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/912. Last visited. 24 February 2018.
Webb,N.L. and others (2006). Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels. Wisconsin center of education research. Retrieved from. http://www.state.nj.us/education/AchieveNJ/resources/DOKWheel.pdf. Last visited. 9th February 2018.
Webb. N. L. (2002). Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas. Retrieved from. http://www.hed.state.nm.us/uploads/files/ABE/Policies/depth_of_knowledge_guide_for_all_subject_areas.pdf. . Last visited. 1 February 2018.
Webb. N. L. (2009). Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Guide Career and Technical Education Definitions. Retrieved from. http://www.aps.edu/re/documents/resources/Webbs_DOK_Guide.pdf. Last visited. 9th February 2018.
Zhukovskiy,V. I and Pivovarov, D. V.(2008). The Nature of Visual Thinking. Journal of Siberian Federal University 1.149-158.